Much has been said & made of Californian Ideology, that West Coast blend of techno-optimism and liberatory self-expression, psychedelic vision and futurism which guided Mondo2000 and Whole Earth, Burning Man and Apple, which fueled Stewart Brand’s long anti-career arc and saw John Perry Barlow straddling the Grateful Dead and Electronic Frontier Foundation.
But there is also a California Metaphysics,4 not so much a coherent position as an axis of conflict between NorCal and SoCal, its Mason-Dixon cutting somewhere between Pismo Beach and Los Olivos. Silicon Valley5 and Haight-Ashbury versus Hollywood and the Elysian Heights. Santa Cruz joint smokers clad in drug rugs, versus the bronzing dab-men of Venice Beach. In the balmy Mediterranean climes south of Pismo, a classical attitude towards masks and persona reigns. Personhood itself is a front, a face, a performance. Where a NorCal hippy might grow out body hair in a back-to-nature move, some reclamation of lost authentic states, the SoCal hustler sees one more fashion trend, one more set of symbolic postures. (“The Jesus-look is in.”) Peel away the surface, some Californian metaphysicians (shrugging) tell us, and you’ll just find another surface. The landscape of the interior is one more social strategy, a disposition in service of performance. Or—if some hidden and privileged interiority is ceded—it’s looked down upon the way a nineteenth century cranium-measuring aristocrat might condescend to natural impulse. Surfaces are ennobling, aspirational. Get back to nature and all you’ll find are animals.
Not that either camp are proper relativists. The promise of psychedelics lies in their ability to de-naturalize the ready-at-hand, to present alternate surfaces and make explicit our structuring interpretive schemas. Beach-bum SoCalites are liable to hedonistic languor, soaking in the brightened colors and tracer viz, tripping just one more performance. NorCal hippies, though, are liable to take those new surfaces and slogans as deeper and underlying truths, to take every new perspective as “the” perspective. Until you dose, you just won’t get it. LSD is paradisal, the trip either life-changing inflection point, or the sort of temporary glimpse of Eden’ll drive a man insane just chasing it forever. Everything changes—until the next morning, when the newly converted fall back on old habits or get reabsorbed by intelligent social webs. Because men are made by their moments, habits are solutions to problems, and none of those problems have gone anywhere.
Pynchon’s novels, which in content treat Californian Ideology and its failings, in form play out a strange psyched-out, ontologically-hip rendition of California Metaphysics’ mystico-philosophical stance. His detectives chase after some transcendental breakthrough like a Flammarion engraving6—some vision of the Other Side, the true nature of things, an Authoritative Representation. All they manage to find is one more partial vision. That’s what a representation is, after all—partial, in both senses of the word. Pynchon liked to quip, in the golden old days, that Murphy’s Law was just a natural corollary of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. Representations leave things out,7 and then the left-out excess rises up to spank the hubris of the would-be systematizer, see also James C. Scott.8 Plus there’s the time-honored problems of pragmatism, the “What would it even mean to find a true metaphor?” that rears its head alongside the 20th century’s “reflexivity”—all complicating the epistemology of a 19th century Arthur Conan Doyle.